Investing in a professionally run strategy, McKiernan argues, takes away the hassle and risks that come with that lack of familiarity. It also creates protection and diversification by gathering dividend and cash flow streams not just from mainstay blue-chip names like Microsoft, but also high-quality businesses that are domiciled across the world.
“If you’re a Canadian investor, probably every investor on your block owns a Canadian bank in some form or another. Should the real estate market soften or some other issue come up creating weakness in banks shares, there’s some ‘psychological comfort’ knowing that others are dealing with the same issue,” he says. “But if you own Novo Nordisk out of Denmark, and that stock declines, you might end up making more sub-optimal decisions because you don’t have that same level of familiarity.”
As expected of professional fund managers, McKiernan does his best to compose letters and commentary to keep unitholders updated on the fund’s performance, as well as the sectors and companies the strategy is exposed to. Those communications provide an extra layer of reassurance for investors, which can go a long way in steering them away from emotional decisions.
Another potential issue investors might face when investing in foreign dividend-paying stocks is tax slippage. If an investor holds a foreign company in a non-registered or a taxable account, they would have to pay a slightly higher tax rate on dividends paid out from foreign companies than if they had invested in a Canadian company.
Certain Canada-domiciled ETFs and investment funds are structured to provide investors cost-effective and potentially tax-efficient exposure to different asset classes, including foreign dividend-paying stocks. But even setting aside that structural optimization, McKiernan believes that with the right strategy, the advantages related to getting access to foreign dividend-paying companies like Microsoft or Nestle offsets the slight cost of tax slippage – and then some.
